(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.90 Contents)


Wheat Information Service
Number 90:37-41 (2000)
Research article

Phylogenetic study of five morphological groups of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum, L. em Thell.) based on cytological analysis

Wenguang Cao1, G. Scoles and P. Hucl

Department of Plant Sciences, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada S7N 5A8.


Summary

The genetic relationships among the five groups of hexaploid wheat: common, spelta, macha, vavilovii and semi-wild wheat (SWW) are not clear although wheat taxonomic and phylogenetic studies have been conducted for several decades based on morphological and cytogenetic analyses. A cytological study of a half-diallel cross involving common, spelta, macha, vavilovii and semi-wild wheat was conducted to assess phylogenetic relationships among these five morphological groups of hexaploid wheat. C-value coefficients of genetic similarity in this study were calculated based on the number of chiasmata in hybrids. The dendrogram based on the C-value coefficients suggests that common wheat is most closely related to vavilovii followed by spelta and SWW, and least related to macha.

Key words: Macha, Spelta, Vavilovii, Semi-wild wheat, Phylogenetic relationships.


Introduction

T. aestivum was divided into six subspecies based on morphological characters: vulgare, sphaerococcum, compactum, spelta, macha and vavilovii (MacKey 1966). However these subspecies have more recently been recognized as groups within T. aestivum with distinct morphological characteristics (Barnes and Beard 1992). Among these groups, spelta, vavilovii and macha have a fragile rachis and are not free-threshing (Singh et al. 1957).

Recently, another hexaploid wheat, semi-wild wheat (SWW), was found in Tibet (Shao et al. 1983). This wheat has a spring habit and grows as a weed in barley and wheat fields. Cytogenetic analysis suggested that the genomic constitution of SWW was AABBDD because it exhibited full chromosome pairing and high fertility when crossed with common wheat (Shao et al. 1983; Chen et al. 1988). Based on meiotic analysis of F1 hybrids with euploid or double ditelosomics of T. aestivum cv. Chinese Spring, and also N-banding, Chen et al. (1988) concluded that the chromosome constitution of SWW was similar to that of the cultivar Chinese Spring. Morphologically, SWW has a rachis fragility and a non-free threshing characters which distinguish it from common wheat. When SWW matures, its spikelets separate naturally and fall to the ground. Although wheat taxonomic and phylogenetic studies have been conducted for several decades based on morphological and cytogenetic analyses, the relationships among the five groups of hexaploid wheat: common wheat, spelta, macha, vavilovii and semi-wild wheat (SWW) are not clear. The objective of this study was to determine the phylogenetic relationships among these five morphological groups of hexaploid wheat based on cytological analysis.

1: Corresponding author: Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, BIgd. 50, 960 Carling Ave. Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6 Canada. (e-mail: caowen@em.agr.ca)

-->Next

(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.90 Contents)